At the beginning of this month,
our own Bobbi Miller's wonderful book, The Girls of Gettysburg, was
released. This historical fiction middle-grade masterpiece has gotten fantastic
reviews already! Bobbi was generous enough to share her insight on just what a
novelty historical fiction truly is, as well as introduce us to who the Girls
of Gettysburg were.
Take it away, Bobbi!
**********************************************************************************
One
hundred fifty one years ago, twelve thousand Confederate forces gathered along
Seminary Ridge. Almost a mile away, at the end of an open field, a copse of
trees marked the Union line standing firm on
Cemetery Ridge. When the signal was given, the men marched across the field.
The line had advanced less than two hundred yards when the federals sent shell
after shell howling into their midst. Boom! Men fell legless, headless,
armless, black with burns and red with blood. Still they marched on across that
field.
And in the middle of this gruesome battle, the bloodiest of the Civil War, were The Girls of Gettysburg…
And in the middle of this gruesome battle, the bloodiest of the Civil War, were The Girls of Gettysburg…
As I was researching another book, I came across a small
newspaper article dated from 1863. It
told of a Union soldier on burial duty, following the Battle at Gettysburg,
coming upon a shocking find: the body of a female Confederate soldier. It was
shocking because she was disguised as a boy. At the time, everyone believed
that girls were not strong enough to do any soldiering; they were too weak, too
pure, too pious to be around roughhousing boys. It was against the law for
girls to enlist. This girl carried no papers, so he could not identify her. She
was buried in an unmarked grave. A Union general noted her presence at the
bottom of his report, stating “one female (private) in rebel uniform.” The note
became her epitaph. I decided I was going to write her story.
Historical
fiction is the coming together of two opposing elements: fact and fiction. As
we know, it isn’t easy to define historical fiction. For some, historical
fiction is first fiction, and therefore anything goes. Others condemn this
blending. Yet, nothing about history is obvious, and facts are often open
to interpretation. Once upon a time, it was considered factual that the world
was flat, that blood-letting was the proper way of treating disease, that women
were emotionally and physically incapable of rational thought. In 1492,
Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue, but he didn’t discover
America. Some would say he was less an explorer and more of a conqueror.
History tends to be written by those who survived it. As such, no history is
without its bias.
So when I tackled the battle of Gettysburg as the focus of this new novel, I had to first get the facts right. This was a daunting task because no other battle has been studied so thoroughly. As such, I researched extensively, reading diaries, personal accounts, regimental histories, military reports. But then, there’s the emotional truth, the story behind the facts.
So when I tackled the battle of Gettysburg as the focus of this new novel, I had to first get the facts right. This was a daunting task because no other battle has been studied so thoroughly. As such, I researched extensively, reading diaries, personal accounts, regimental histories, military reports. But then, there’s the emotional truth, the story behind the facts.
Historical
fiction makes the facts matter to the reader. If I didn’t get this right,
creating characters true to their time and place, the readers won’t care about
the facts. For me, the only way to discover this emotional truth was to walk
the battlefield of Gettysburg, and witness that landscape where my characters
lived over one hundred and fifty years ago. I traveled to Gettysburg four
times, walking the battlefield and talking to re-enactors and the park rangers.
David McCullough once said, “We
are raising a generation of young Americans who are by-and-large historically
illiterate…The textbooks are dreary, they’re done by committee, they’re often
hilariously politically correct and they’re not doing any good. [But] there are
wonderful books, past and present. There is literature in history.” Avi,
an award-winning master of the genre, once said that some historical fiction
stays close to the known facts, while others are little more than costume
drama. But facts do not make a story. Ultimately, what is most important is the
story, and the characters, according to Avi. “Truth may be stranger than
fiction, but fiction makes truth less a stranger.”
The literary process that defines
historical fiction allows readers to connect emotionally to historical figures
and events. It introduces readers to different points of view. As Tarry
Lindquist (1995) said, historical fiction “puts people back into history.”
While textbooks tend to underscore coverage, this lacks depth, and as a result,
“individuals—no matter how famous or important—are reduced to a few
sentences…Good historical fiction presents individuals as they are, neither
good nor bad.”
Historical fiction helps young
readers develop a feeling for a living past, illustrating the continuity of
life, according to Karen Cushman. Historical fiction, “like all good history,
demonstrates how history is made up of the decisions and actions of individuals
and that the future will be made up of our decisions and actions.”
The best historical fiction “brings
both story and history to life,” said Janet Fox (Faithful, 2010).
Well-researched and well-written historical fiction is packed with—but not
burdened by—the details. “In the best historical fiction, story trumps truth,
because story is truth: we are all protagonists of our
own stories.”